There are several possible relationships between language and
society. One is that social structure may either influence or determine
linguistic structure and behavior.
Certain evidence may support this view: age-grading phenomenon 【M1】__________
whereby young children speak differently from older children and, in a 【M2】__________
turn, children speak differently from mature adults; studies which show
that the varieties of language that speakers use reflect such matters like 【M3】__________
their regional, social, or ethnic origin and possibly even their sex (or
gender); and other studies which show that particular ways of speaking,
choices of words, and even rules for conversing are in fact highly
determined by certain social requirements.
A second possible relationship is directly opposed the first: linguistic【M4】__________
structure and behavior may either influence or determine social
structure.
A third possible relationship is that the influence is bi-directional:
language and society may influence each other.
A fourth possibility is to assume that there is no relationship at all
between linguistic structure and social structure and that every is 【M5】__________
independent of the other. A variant of this possibility would be to say
that, because there might be some such relationship, present attempts to 【M6】__________
characterize it is essentially premature, given what we know about both 【M7】__________
language and society. Actually, this variant view appears to be the one
which Chomsky himself holds: he prefers to develop an asocial 【M8】__________
linguistics as a preliminary to many other kind of linguistics, such an 【M9】__________
asocial approach being, in his view, logically superior. 【M10】_________
【M4】
opposed^—to