Bias, which takes many forms, affects how doctors think and the treatment decisions they make. Racial biases in treatment decisions by physicians are well documented. But a growing body of scientific research on physician decision-making shows that doctors exhibit other biases as well—cognitive ones—that influence the way they think and treat patients.
Sometimes these cognitive biases are simple overreactions to recent events, what psychologists term availability bias. One study found that when patients experienced an unlikely adverse side effect of a drug, their doctor was less likely to order that same drug for the next patient whose condition might call for it, even though the efficacy and appropriateness of the drug had not changed.
When comparing patients who had a heart attack in the weeks leading up to their 80th birthdays with those who’d recently had an 80th birthday, we found that physicians were significantly less likely to perform a coronary artery bypass surgery for the “older” patients.
Awareness of these cognitive biases has prompted efforts to reduce them in clinical decision-making. Given our growing understanding of the errors that doctors can make, these biases are too costly to ignore.
偏见有很多种形式,其影响着医生的思考方式和治疗决策。种族偏见对于医生治疗方案的影响已经有了非常翔实的记录。但是有越来越多关于医生决策(过程)的科学研究表明,除了种族偏见,医生还有其他偏见——认知偏见,这些认知偏见影响着医生思考和治疗患者的方法。
有时候这些认知偏见只是对最近发生事情的过度反应,这种过度反应被心理学家们称为“可获得性偏见”。一项研究发现,当多位病人因用同一种药物后出现罕见副作用时。他们的医生给下一位可能需用此药的病人开这个药的概率就会降低,即使这个药物本身的疗效和适用范围并没有任何变化。
将在80岁前的几周内犯心脏病的病人和刚过80岁的心脏病病人进行对比,我们发现,医生给年龄偏大的病人做冠状动脉搭桥手术的概率显著降低。
在认识到这些认知偏见后,已经有不少人在努力研究如何减少这些偏见对于临床决策的影响。鉴于对医生可能犯的错误越来越了解,这些认知偏见的代价太高而不容忽视。